Violante

Violante v. Communities Sw Development

Good Law
138 Cal. App. 4th 972·41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 673
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 16, 2006E037333California2,836 words

Opinion

Opinion

Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, Sandra Rae Benson, Pasadena, Patricia M. Gates and Roberta D. Perkins, Oakland, for Northern California Electrical Construction Industry Labor-Management Cooperative Trust and Work Preservation Fund, a non-profit labor/management cooperative venture and Northern California Basic Crafts Alliance on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant Margarito Violante.

We hold that a subcontractor's employee on a public works project cannot sue the prime or general contractor on theories of statutory or contractual liability for the nonpayment of prevailing wages by the subcontractor, the employee's direct employer. Although both sides on this issue have advanced compelling public policy arguments in favor of their respective positions, we deem those more appropriate for legislative rather than judicial consideration. ( California Teachers Assn. v. Governing Bd. of Rialto Unified School Dist. (1997) 14 Cal.4th 627, 632 , 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 671 , 927 P.2d 1175 ; Crusader Insurance Co. v. Scottsdale Insurance Co. (1997) 54 Cal.App.4th 121, 134 , 62 Cal.Rptr.2d 620 .) Our review of the statutory scheme governing prevailing wages finds no private right of action for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.