Harris

Harris v. Investor's Business Daily, Inc.

Good Law
138 Cal. App. 4th 28·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 447·2006 Daily Journal DAR 3775·41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 108·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2685
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 29, 2006B178428California5,157 words

Opinion

Opinion

Epstein, J.

In this wage-and-hour class action lawsuit, telemarketers who sold newspaper subscriptions alleged violations of federal and state labor laws. The principal issues on appeal are: (1) whether a federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) claim may serve as the predicate act for a California Business and Professions Code section 17200 (section 17200) cause of action; (2) whether the employees qualified for the commission exemption from California overtime laws; and (3) whether the employer lawfully deducted points employees had earned from a sale if the customer later cancelled the subscription. Finding the FLSA does not preempt the section 17200 claim, we conclude the trial court improperly sustained the demurrer to that cause of action. We find triable issues of material fact exist as to the remaining claims and reverse the judgment as to those causes of action.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

Appellants Toby Harris, Kevin O’Connor, Michael Sandercock, Alex Lane, and Michael Bey were employed as telemarketers to sell subscriptions to a financial newspaper, Investor’s Business Daily, Inc. (IBD). IBD sold subscriptions through Direct Marketing Specialists, Inc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.