Rostai

Rostai v. Neste Enterprises

Good Law
138 Cal. App. 4th 326·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 476·2006 Daily Journal DAR 4075·41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 411·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2824
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 5, 2006E037544California4,263 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

In this case we hold that the doctrine of primary assumption of the risk is a complete defense to an action for damages based on the alleged negligence of a personal fitness trainer in failing to investigate the cardiac risk factors of a client as a result of which the client allegedly suffered a heart attack during his first training workout. Masood Rostai, plaintiff and appellant (hereafter plaintiff), sued Neste Enterprises doing business as Gold’s Gym (hereafter Gold’s Gym), and Jared Shoultz, defendants and respondents (hereafter referred to either individually by name or collectively as defendants), for damages based on negligence. In his complaint, plaintiff alleged that he had entered into an agreement with defendants to provide him with a customized physical fitness program; defendants owed plaintiff a duty to investigate his health history, including his current physical condition and cardiac risk factors; on September 11, 2002, plaintiff participated in his first training session at Gold’s Gym with defendant Shoultz; defendant Shoultz knew plaintiff was not physically fit and was overweight; defendant Shoultz was aggressive in his training of plaintiff; near…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.