Aubry

Viceroy Gold Corp. v. Aubry

Good Law
858 F. Supp. 1007·94 Daily Journal DAR 11711·1994 WL 393966·147 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2365·1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10504
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 1994C-93-4116-VRWCalifornia9,303 words

Opinion

Opinion

Walker, J.

ORDER

Plaintiff Viceroy Gold Corporation (“Viceroy”) operates a gold processing facility in San Bernardino County called the Castle Mountain Mine (“Castle Mountain"). Castle Mountain is a non-union mine employing workers who operate equipment to recover gold ore from rock. The ore processing is performed by complex machinery utilizing a substantially automated procedure. Witt Decl in Supp at ¶¶4-6.

Castle Mountain operates twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, using rotating shifts. The mine workers currently work eight-hour shifts and forty-hour work weeks. Because housing near the facility is limited, many of the mine workers commute seventy-five miles or more to the mine from Las Vegas, Nevada and its environs. Many workers spend three hours a day commuting to and from work on highways that are narrow and unsafe. During the last two years, two employees of Castle Mountain sub-contractors died in auto accidents during their commutes. Witt Decl in Supp at ¶ 10.

The vast majority of Viceroy’s employees at Castle Mountain have expressed dissatisfaction with the eight-hour work day; they prefer twelve-hour shifts. In October 1992, thirty-two out of thirty-two employees…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.