Southeastern Express Systems v. Southern Guaranty Insurance

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 365·34 Cal. App. 4th 1·40 Cal. Rptr. 2d 216·95 Daily Journal DAR 5022·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2908
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 19, 1995A066912California3,589 words

Opinion

Opinion

Strankman, J.

A general partnership and its individual general partners, residents of Georgia, sued their insurance company for breach of contract and bad faith insurance practices for refusing to defend a federal case brought in California. The insurance company, a Georgia corporation, obtained an order quashing service of process for lack of jurisdiction. We reverse the order, holding that an insurance company providing commercial liability insurance to an interstate business covering injuries arising from offenses committed in California has purposefully established minimum contacts with the state and may fairly be subjected to litigation in California when denying a duty to defend alleged losses arising here.

Statement of Facts

Respondent Southern Guaranty Insurance Company of Georgia is a corporation organized under the laws of Georgia and maintains its principal place of business in Georgia. Respondent has no physical presence in California—neither offices, property, nor bank accounts. Respondent has never been authorized to do business in California, has never filed a California income tax return, and has no agent for service of process here. Appellants are Southeastern…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.