Hill

People v. Hill

Bad Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 402·34 Cal. App. 4th 727·41 Cal. Rptr. 2d 39·95 Daily Journal DAR 5604·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3268
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 28, 1995A064473California4,067 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dossee, J.

Defendant is imprisoned for life without possibility of parole after a jury trial involving two separate incidents: robberies and first degree felony murder with special circumstances at a Taco Bell restaurant on July 4, 1992, and robbery and attempted premeditated murder at a Gas and Food market on August 11, 1992. On appeal, defendant primarily challenges the joinder of the two cases for trial. He also contends the trial court should not have admitted evidence that defendant solicited the killing of a victim-witness to prevent the witness’s testimony and the trial court should not have limited defendant’s cross-examination of the key prosecution witness. We affirm the convictions.

Facts

The Taco Bell Case

Defendant had worked at the West Pittsburg Taco Bell from May 26 to May 29, 1992. He left the job saying he was moving out of town. In fact, defendant lived with his girlfriend across the street from the Taco Bell. Defendant told his girlfriend that Taco Bell made a lot of money and it would be a good place to rob.

On July 4, 1992, about 7 a.m., a Black man wearing an old, green, hooded army jacket pushed his way through the doors of the Taco Bell as the manager,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.