Hollingshead

Hollingshead v. Matsen

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 381·34 Cal. App. 4th 525·40 Cal. Rptr. 2d 603·19 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1333·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3107
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 25, 1995Docket Nos. A064628, A064631California6,978 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kline, J.

Introduction

In these consolidated cases plaintiffs Nyle G. Henderson and Diane Henderson and plaintiff Dianne Hollingshead, individually and as administrator of the estate of Raymond Styol Hollingshead, appeal following adverse summary judgments of the Humboldt County Superior Court finding plaintiffs’ claims preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and dismissing their claims against defendants Ralph Matsen, R.G. Matsen Insurance Agency, Inc., and Robert Burchitt, insurance brokers and agents. We shall affirm the judgment.

Statement of Facts/Procedural Background

Raymond Hollingshead, the deceased husband of plaintiff Hollingshead, was an employee of Customer Truck Service, Inc. In late 1989, plaintiff Nyle Henderson, president of Customer Truck Service Inc. (CTS), was approached by defendant Robert Burchitt, a licensed insurance agent working for and on behalf of defendant R.G. Matsen Insurance Agency, Inc., and its owner defendant Ralph Matsen. Burchitt offered to review the group health insurance plan that was made available by CTS to its employees. CTS made available to its employees a group health insurance policy and paid the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.