Peltier

Peltier v. McCloud River Railroad

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 463·34 Cal. App. 4th 1809·41 Cal. Rptr. 2d 182·95 Daily Journal DAR 6574·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3835
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 22, 1995C018729California5,862 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

The trial court dismissed plaintiff Timothy P. Peltier’s personal injury suit for failure to bring the case to trial within three years (Code Civ. Proc., § 583.410; all further undesignated section references are to this code). He moved for relief under section 473, asserting that his attorney’s decision not to move the case forward until plaintiff’s condition had stabilized constituted mistake or neglect within the meaning of that provision. Denied relief in the trial court, he makes the same contention here. We shall affirm.

Background

On June 28, 1990, plaintiff filed an action against defendant McCloud River Railroad Company seeking damages for work-related injuries under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act ( 45 U.S.C. §51 et seq.). Defendant answered the complaint on October 11,1990. Discovery ensued, and defendant took plaintiff’s deposition on April 5, 1991. Plaintiff took no further action to move the case forward for 22 months.

On March 4, 1993, plaintiff filed an at-issue memorandum and a certificate of readiness for trial. However, following plaintiff’s failure to file a pretrial conference statement as ordered by the trial court, the matter was dropped…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.