Buehler

Buehler v. Sbardellati

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 466·34 Cal. App. 4th 1527·41 Cal. Rptr. 2d 104·95 Daily Journal DAR 6456·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3779
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 19, 1995D017900California5,685 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nares, J.

In this legal malpractice action, Donald L. Buehler, M.D., appeals a judgment entered in favor of Attorney Robert Sbardellati after a jury returned a special verdict finding Sbardellati was not negligent. The gist of Buehler’s action was that Sbardellati breached his professional responsibilities as an attorney while performing certain services in connection with a 1985 Texas real estate investment involving a limited partnership in which Buehler was to be a limited partner and James Parrish was the general partner; where both Buehler and Parrish for years had been clients of Sbardellati and his law firm, Harrigan, Ruff, Ryder & Sbardellati (HRRS); and Sbardellati possessed information about the particular real property involved as well as Parrish’s past dealings with it.

Buehler asserts (1) error in instructions that (a) a finding of negligence against an attorney required a conflict of interest on the attorney’s part, and (b) a conflict does not exist where two clients pursue a common goal; (2) abuse of discretion in the trial court’s precluding him from arguing evidence that would have established that Sbardellati’s clients had conflicting interests; (3) an absence of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.