Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Superior Court

Good Law
10 Cal. App. 4th 1509·13 Cal. Rptr. 2d 449·1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 1325·92 Daily Journal DAR 15380·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9253
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 17, 1992A059008California903 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dossee, J.

Petitioners, Farmers Insurance Exchange and Mid-Century Insurance Company (hereafter collectively referred to as Farmers), are the defendants below in actions filed by real parties which have been ordered coordinated under Code of Civil Procedure section 404.4. By timely petition for writ of mandate (§ 170.3, subd. (d); People v. Hull (1991) 1 Cal.4th 266 [ 2 Cal.Rptr.2d 526 , 820 P.2d 1036 ]), Farmers seeks to reverse denial of its section 170.6 challenge to the coordination judge.

We conclude that the challenge should have been accepted by reason of rule 1515 of the California Rules of Court (rule 1515 hereafter). Accordingly, we issue our peremptory writ in the first instance.

The parties do not dispute the facts leading up to this petition. On July 20, 1992, three cases previously consolidated in Contra Costa County Superior Court were coordinated with a pending action in Los Angeles County Superior Court as the E-Z Reader Coverage Cases, Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 2719. (§ 404.) On August 4, 1992, the parties were served with an order appointing the Honorable William A. O’Malley as the coordination trial judge. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 1540.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.