Lisec

Lisec v. United Airlines, Inc.

Good Law
10 Cal. App. 4th 1500·11 Cal. Rptr. 2d 689·1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 1074·92 Daily Journal DAR 12332·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7662
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 2, 1992H008551California2,665 words

Opinion

Opinion

Premo, J.

Pursuant to a judgment awarding damages for wrongful termination, appellant United Airlines, Inc. (hereafter, United), paid the amount of the judgment minus withholdings for state and federal income and Social Security taxes. The recipients, respondents James K. Lisec and Krishan K. Jagga, refused to acknowledge full satisfaction of the judgment, claiming that the damages were neither wages nor earned income and therefore were not subject to withholding. Appellants Richard J. Ferris and United appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion to compel acknowledgement of full satisfaction of the judgment.

Facts

Lisec and Jagga, long-term management employees of United, aggrieved when United paid a $1,000 award rather than 10 percent of estimated first-year savings for their suggestion that revenues could be increased by a liberalization of discount fare policies, sued United in 1973 for breach of contract and fraud. They won a well-reported verdict of almost $2 million at jury trial, but the verdict was reversed on appeal. (Lisec v. United Air Lines, Inc. (1978) 85 Cal.App.3d 969 [ 149 Cal.Rptr. 847 ], hereafter, Lisec I.)

While Lisec I was pending, respondents received…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.