Sierra Club v. California Department of Forestry & Fire Protection

Good Law
150 Cal. App. 4th 370·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 670·2007 Daily Journal DAR 5978·59 Cal. Rptr. 3d 9·2007 WL 934897
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 29, 2007A113774California3,405 words

Opinion

Opinion

Marchiano, J.

Plaintiffs Sierra Club and Friends of the Gualala River appeal from an order of the trial court denying their petition for writ of mandate. Plaintiffs’ petition challenged a decision of defendant California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF) to issue a timber conversion permit (TCP) for a site of timberland owned by respondents and real parties in interest Phil Campbell et al. (real parties), who sought the TCP so they could convert the timberland to a vineyard. CDF issued the TCP after adopting a mitigated negative declaration that concluded that the timberland conversion project would not have a significant impact on the environment, and thus did not require the preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR).

Plaintiffs contend there is substantial evidence to support a fair argument that the timberland conversion project may have a. significant effect on the environment, thus requiring the preparation of an EIR. We agree and reverse.

I. FACTS

Real parties, Phil Campbell, June Campbell, Rex Campbell, Steve Campbell, and Karen Hay, own 88 acres of timberland on a ridgetop near the town of Annapolis in Sonoma County. The timberland is located within…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.