Cervantes

People v. Cervantes

Good Law
150 Cal. App. 4th 1117·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 758·58 Cal. Rptr. 3d 861·2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5391
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 16, 2007B183412California1,482 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Wilfredo Arias Cervantes intends to appeal a judgment following his conviction of drug crimes. (Health & Saf. Code, §§ 11350, subd. (a), 11364.) He faces an insurmountable obstacle. The court reporter is unable to prepare a trial transcript. Current defense counsel did not try the case. The trial judge has no recollection of the trial proceedings. Yet, he approves a settled statement. This is unsettling. We vacate the order approving the settled statement and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS

Deputy Sheriff Michael Rowland saw Cervantes riding a bicycle at night without a lit headlight. He stopped Cervantes, who appeared to be intoxicated. After handcuffing him, Rowland retrieved items he believed Cervantes had thrown away nearby—tar heroin wrapped in plastic, hypodermic syringes, a spoon wrapped in a paper towel, and a rolled-up newspaper.

At trial in March, 2005, Rowland was the only prosecution witness. After the jury’s guilty verdicts, Cervantes appealed and requested preparation of a reporter’s transcript. The court reporter prepared transcripts of pretrial pro ceedings, jury instructions, and counsel’s closing argument. But she filed an affidavit stating that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.