Ellis

Miller v. Ellis

Good Law
103 Cal. App. 4th 373·126 Cal. Rptr. 2d 667·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4903·2002 Daily Journal DAR 12553·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10868
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 31, 2002A095705California3,364 words

Opinion

Opinion

McGUINESS, J.

Mitchell D. Ellis appeals from a judgment in favor of respondent Lawrence D. Miller on Miller’s action for equitable indemnity. The action arises from a previous personal injury lawsuit and ensuing malpractice action by the personal injury plaintiff against Attorneys Ellis, Miller, and Joseph Pisano for failing to bring the underlying case to trial within five years. Ellis contends the trial court erred as a matter of law in applying the collateral source rule to this action, in which one of two cotortfeasors (Miller) is seeking equitable indemnification from the other (Ellis) for sums paid in settlement of the underlying personal injury action by an insurance company. Because the trial court misapplied the collateral source rule and the remedy of equitable indemnification in a way that would result in unjust enrichment, we reverse and remand for modification of the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

After suffering injury in a slip-and-fall accident in July 1990, Michael Fay retained appellant Ellis to represent him in a personal injury action. On April 9, 1991, Ellis filed suit on behalf of Fay. In 1992, Ellis associated respondent Miller to assist in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.