Beydoun

Casa Herrera, Inc. v. Beydoun

Good Law
103 Cal. App. 4th 83·126 Cal. Rptr. 2d 431
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 2003D038326California4,617 words

Opinion

Opinion

McDonald, J.

Appellant Casa Herrera, Inc. (Casa Herrera) prevailed at trial in an underlying lawsuit brought against it by respondents Am Mex Food Industries, Inc. (Am Mex) and Nasser Beydoun (Beydoun). On appeal from judgment in the underlying lawsuit, this court in an unpublished opinion affirmed the judgment in favor of Casa Herrera, concluding that the parol evidence rule precluded Am Mex and Beydoun from establishing their claims against Casa Herrera for breach of contract and fraud in connection with Casa Herrera's sale of a tortilla oven to Am Mex. This court also affirmed an award of attorney fees in favor of Casa Herrera against Am Mex and Beydoun. ( Beydoun v. Casa Herrera (Jan. 10, 2000, D030061) [nonpub. opn.])

Casa Herrera then filed the current action pleading malicious prosecution claims against Am Mex and Beydoun, and a separate malicious prosecution claim against respondents Community First National Bank and Tom Ferrara (collectively Bank), which alleged Bank instigated and encouraged the filing and continuation of the underlying action. Casa Herrera's complaint also pleaded a claim against Bank under Code of Civil Procedure section 1908, subdivision (b)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.