In Re SO

Good Law
103 Cal. App. 4th 453·126 Cal. Rptr. 2d 554
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 8, 2002D040242California3,048 words

Opinion

Opinion

Julie E. Braden, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, San Diego, for Minor.

I.L. (Mother) appeals following the juvenile court's dispositional order declaring her son, S. 0., a dependent and allowing her to retain custody. She contends the allegations of the dependency petition fail to state a cause of action and there is no substantial evidence supporting the jurisdictional finding (Welf. & InstCode, § 300, subd. (b)). [1] We affirm.

Before S.'s birth, Mother had six children. Enrique O. (Enrique) was the presumed father of all but the eldest of these six children, Y.C. Enrique is also S.'s presumed father.

In December 2000, the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (the Agency) filed dependency petitions for S.'s six siblings. They were made juvenile court dependents because in November and December, they were exposed to violent confrontations in the family home between Enrique and Mother (after drinking, Enrique slapped Mother's face repeatedly in front of the children) (§ 300, subd. (b)) and from 1997 to December 2000, Enrique sexually abused Y.C. (§ 300, subds.(d), (j)). The children were placed in foster care. The court ordered that Enrique…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.