In Re Brian K.

People v. Brian K.

Good Law
103 Cal. App. 4th 39·126 Cal. Rptr. 2d 580·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4862·2002 Daily Journal DAR 12317·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10662
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 24, 2002B154305California1,710 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

In a notice filed pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 777, the juvenile court found that the minor Brian K. violated his probation and it imposed a $150 fine. We conclude, among other things, that section 777 by itself does not authorize the imposition of fines. But the court does have authority to impose fines in a section 777 proceeding pursuant to other statutory provisions. We strike the $150 fine and remand.

Facts

The district attorney filed a section 602 petition alleging that Brian K., a minor, committed misdemeanor petty theft. (Pen. Code, § 484, subd. (a).) Brian K. admitted the allegations of the petition. The juvenile court placed him on probation without wardship for a period not to exceed six months and ordered him to pay a $50 restitution fine.

Thereafter, the district attorney filed a section 777 notice alleging that Brian K. violated probation by being truant from school, possessing a marijuana pipe and using marijuana. Brian K. admitted the allegations. The juvenile court declared Brian K. a ward of the court under the supervision of the probation officer and permitted him to reside with his mother.

At the hearing, the court stated it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.