Kohler

Kohler v. Interstate Brands Corp.

Caution
103 Cal. App. 4th 1096·127 Cal. Rptr. 2d 366·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 5039·2002 Daily Journal DAR 13273·67 Cal. Comp. Cases 1447
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 25, 2002C038912California1,952 words

Opinion

Opinion

Robie, J.

In this action for gender-based harassment under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.), the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant Interstate Brands Corporation (Interstate) on the ground plaintiff Renae Kohler (Kohler) had released Interstate from liability for her FEHA claim by signing a standard workers’ compensation compromise and release agreement releasing “all claims and causes of action” against Interstate. Kohler appeals, arguing the broad language of the workers’ compensation release was not sufficient to release her civil claims against Interstate. The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Jefferson v. Department of Youth Authority (2002) 28 Cal.4th 299 [ 121 Cal.Rptr.2d 391 , 48 P.3d 423 ] (Jefferson) compels a different conclusion. Accordingly, we will affirm the judgment.

Factual and Procedural History

Kohler began her employment with Interstate in June 1977. While working at Interstate, she claims she was physically and verbally harassed by fellow Interstate employee Ralph Gallego. The details of the harassment are not relevant to this appeal.

In 1999, Kohler filed a workers’ compensation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.