Lacefield

People v. Lacefield

Bad Law
157 Cal. App. 4th 249·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1951·68 Cal. Rptr. 3d 508
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 28, 2007B191217California5,017 words

Opinion

Opinion

Flier, J.

Appellant Erick Darnell Lacefield was convicted of obstructing or resisting an executive officer in the performance of duty in violation of Penal Code section 69. He was sentenced to the midterm of two years in prison, after the trial court struck a prior strike conviction. He contends that the trial court committed reversible error when it refused to instruct on section 148, subdivision (a)(1) (section 148(a)(1)), as a lesser included offense of section 69. Section 148(a)(1) punishes, as a misdemeanor, the crime of resisting, delaying, or obstructing a peace officer in the performance of duty. We find merit in the contention, because section 148(a)(1) sets forth two different types of offenses (In re Manuel G. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 805 [ 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 701 , 941 P.2d 880 ] (Manuel G.)), and section 148(a)(1) is a lesser included offense of the type of offense in section 69 on which the prosecution relied here. We further find that the error was prejudicial. We therefore reverse.

FACTS

1. Prosecution Evidence

Gardena Police Officers Mike Sargent, Matthew Hassoldt, William McReynolds, and Atanacio Jimenez testified for the prosecution. Around 11:00 p.m. on October 28, 2005,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.