In Re Veronica G.

Bad Law
157 Cal. App. 4th 179·68 Cal. Rptr. 3d 465
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 27, 2007A117131California3,618 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mother Christy G. and father Samuel G., Sr. (jointly "parents") appeal the juvenile court's jurisdictional order regarding their minor daughter Veronica G., and son Samuel G., Jr. Parents contend: (1) that the juvenile court's jurisdictional order is not supported by substantial evidence; and (2) that the juvenile court failed to comply with the notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act ("ICWA"). As more fully explained below, we conclude the juvenile court's jurisdictional order is supported by substantial evidence. However, we remand for the limited but essential purpose of ensuring compliance with the ICWA.

On December 29, 2006, respondent San Mateo County Human Services Agency ("Agency") filed protective custody warrants and juvenile dependency petitions pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b) [1] on behalf of Veronica (born April 1995) and Samuel (born August 1997). The petitions alleged that oh or about December 27, 2006, during a welfare check at the home by the San Mateo County Sheriffs Department, both children stated that their mother physically abused them on a daily basis by choking, kicking, pulling their hair,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.