Ticconi

Ticconi v. Blue Shield of California Life & Health Ins. Co.

Good Law
157 Cal. App. 4th 707·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1991·68 Cal. Rptr. 3d 785
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 4, 2007B190427California7,117 words

Opinion

Opinion

The question before us is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying a motion to certify a class under Proposition 64. Plaintiff Augusto Ticconi sued his health insurance provider defendant Blue Shield of California Life and Health Insurance Company (Blue Shield Life) [1] under the Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 (the UCL)). Plaintiff alleged that Blue Shield Life violated Insurance Code sections 10113 and 10381.5 [2] by failing to attach his application to or endorse it on the insurance policy when issued, and later rescinding the policy on the ground he had made misrepresentations in that application. The trial court denied plaintiffs motion for certification of a class of similarly situated insureds on the ground that Blue Shield Life's defenses of fraud and unclean hands raised individual issues that predominated over the common issues related to liability. Plaintiff appeals.

We conclude that the ruling denying class certification was erroneous. Equitable defenses cannot be used to defeat a UCL cause of action and Blue Shield Life may not raise the defense of fraud based on statements that insureds made in an application for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.