People v. Lincoln

Good Law
157 Cal. App. 4th 196·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1940·68 Cal. Rptr. 3d 596
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 27, 2007B188042California3,685 words

Opinion

Opinion

Zelon, J.

Andrew Lincoln was convicted of three counts of attempted voluntary manslaughter and three counts of assault with a firearm, with personal use and great bodily injury allegations found true by the jury. He was sentenced on all six counts and associated enhancements, with the sentences for the assault counts and their enhancements stayed pursuant to Penal Code section 654. On appeal, this court reversed his attempted voluntary manslaughter convictions and remanded with directions that if the People elected not to retry Lincoln or if he was acquitted in a retrial, the court should lift the stay of execution on the assault counts and related enhancements. When the People chose not to retry Lincoln, instead of merely lifting the stay, the trial court revisited the three previously imposed assault sentences, ordering that they be served consecutively and altering the sentences on two of three counts pursuant to their designation as consecutive sentences.

Lincoln appealed, claiming that the trial court lacked jurisdiction on remand to modify his sentence and that the upper term and consecutive sentences violated his right to a jury trial under Blakely v. Washington (2004) 542…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.