McCoy

McCoy v. Superior Court

Good Law
157 Cal. App. 4th 225·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1946·68 Cal. Rptr. 3d 483
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 27, 2007G038589California2,955 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rylaarsdam, J.

Petitioner Derrick McCoy (plaintiff) asks us to reverse an order striking portions of his complaint seeking waiting time penalties for late payment of wages as barred by the one-year statute of limitations in Code of Civil Procedure section 340, subdivision (a) (section 340(a)). He argues that, pursuant to Labor Code section 203 (section 203), when an action seeks waiting time penalties only, the statute of limitations is the same as when a plaintiff sues for both back wages and penalties, which in this case, he contends, is four years. We determine that when a suit seeks only waiting time penalties, the one-year statute under section 340(a) governs.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff’s complaint alleges he was an employee of real party in interest Kimco Staffing Services, Inc. (defendant), an agency that provides temporary employees. He is the lead plaintiff in a putative class action seeking waiting time penalties under section 203 for defendant’s alleged failure to timely pay final wages on completion of temporary work assignments in violation of Labor Code sections 201 and 202. The complaint alleges that, instead of paying plaintiffs upon discharge or within 72…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.