In Re Marriage of Schopfer

In Re the Marriage of Schopfer

Good Law
109 Cal. Rptr. 3d 444·184 Cal. App. 4th 953
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 18, 2010C060549California2,084 words

Opinion

Opinion

Robie, J.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS OPINION IS DEPUBLISHED UPON GRANTING OF PETITION FOR REVIEW. THE OPINION APPEARS BELOW WITH A GRAY BACKGROUND.] OPINION Since the death of his ex-wife, William C. Schopfer (father) shared legal and physical custody of his daughter, Jennifer, with her stepfather, Daniel C. Bonebrake. Pursuant to a court order, father also paid to *Page 955 Bonebrake $900 each month for child support. Four months before Jennifer graduated from high school, however, father moved to reduce his child support obligation to zero. The trial court denied his motion. On appeal, father makes the same three contentions he made in the trial court. First, he contends that he cannot be compelled to pay child support to a third party, absent an agreement. Second, he contends that he can no longer be required to pay child support for Jennifer because she is now 18 years old. Third, he contends that an order compelling him to pay child support for Jennifer is inequitable because she is in boarding school, the tuition for which is paid by her mother's estate, and thus Bonebrake is no longer paying Jennifer's expenses. Finding none of father's claims to have merit, we affirm the order of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.