In Re Kc

Good Law
108 Cal. Rptr. 3d 503·184 Cal. App. 4th 120
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 26, 2010F058395California3,009 words

Opinion

Opinion

THE COURT. [*] —J.C. (father) appeals from an order terminating parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26) to his son, K. [1] At the same hearing that resulted in the termination, the trial court also denied a petition for relative placement (§ 388) brought by the child's paternal grandparents (grandparents). Father's sole contention is that the court erred in denying the relative placement request. On review, we affirm. We hold father does not have appellate standing to contest the denial order.

In December 2008, the Kings County Superior Court adjudged infant K. a juvenile dependent child and removed him from parental custody. There was a substantial risk that the infant would be abused or neglected. His mother's chronic abuse of methamphetamine and alcohol rendered her unable to provide K. with regular care and supervision. (§ 300, subd. (b).) In addition, she had previously neglected and failed to reunify with K.'s siblings who were juvenile dependents of the Tulare County Superior Court. (§ 300, subd. (j).) At the same December 2008 hearing, the court denied both parents reunification services (§ 361.5, subd. (b)(10), (11) & (13)) and set an April 2009 section 366.26

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.