Casas

People v. Casas

Good Law
109 Cal. Rptr. 3d 811·184 Cal. App. 4th 1242·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 742
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 25, 2010E048184California1,632 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ramirez, J.

Defendant, Jorge Jose Casas, a salesman at a car dealership, used a trade-in vehicle to follow a customer home to collect the downpayment, a process referred to as “chasing.” However, he did not return to the dealership immediately with the downpayment or the trade-in vehicle, using the vehicle to drive nearly 400 miles in search of drugs to purchase using the cash portion of the downpayment. He was convicted of embezzlement (Pen. Code, §§ 503, 508) following a jury trial and sentenced to state prison.

Defendant initially filed a brief in accordance with the procedures outlined in People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 [ 158 Cal.Rptr. 839 , 600 P.2d 1071 ], requesting that we independently review the entire record to determine if there were arguable issues. We requested supplemental briefing to address conflicting decisions relating to the elements of the crime of embezzlement, specifically, (1) whether the trial court erroneously excluded evidence that defendant lacked an intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property, and (2) whether the trial court erred in instructing the jury that an intent to temporarily deprive the owner of the property was enough.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.