Barnett

Barnett v. FIRST NATIONAL INS. CO. OF AMERICA

Bad Law
110 Cal. Rptr. 3d 99·184 Cal. App. 4th 1454·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 751
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 26, 2010B203310California2,032 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jackson, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Richard and Paula Barnett appeal from a judgment on special verdict in favor of defendant First National Insurance Company of America and an order denying their motion for new trial. Defendant appeals from the judgment and an order awarding costs.

On appeal, plaintiffs contend numerous errors led to a judgment erroneous as a matter of law and unsupported by substantial evidence. For this reason, they also contend, the trial court abused its discretion in denying their new trial motion.

On its cross-appeal, defendant claims error in the trial court’s denial of its request for expert fees under Code of Civil Procedure section 998.

For the reasons set forth below, we disagree and affirm.

ON APPEAL

FACTS

A.-H.

DISCUSSION

A.-E.

ON CROSS-APPEAL

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Prior to trial, defendant served plaintiffs with an offer to compromise pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998 (section 998). The offer was in the amount of $100,000 “in favor of plaintiffs Richard Barnett and Paula Barnett jointly, with each side to bear their/its own costs.” Plaintiffs did not accept this offer.

Following trial and judgment in its favor, defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.