Alvarez

Alvarez v. WORKERS'COMP. APPEALS BD.

Good Law
108 Cal. Rptr. 3d 917·184 Cal. App. 4th 860
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 14, 2010B218847California4,631 words

Opinion

Opinion

In a denied workers' compensation claim for death benefits, a panel-qualified medical evaluator (Lab. Code, § 4062.2) [1] requested a copy of certain records in an ex parte telephone conversation with defense counsel. The claimant objected to the ex parte communication and petitioned, inter alia, for a new panel-qualified medical evaluator under section 4062.3, subdivision (f), which prohibits ex parte communications between a party and a panel-qualified medical evaluator and, in the event of a violation, allows the other party to seek a new panel-qualified medical evaluator from another panel. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the petition, reasoning that the ex parte communication was initiated by the panel-qualified medical evaluator and not a party, and involved administrative and not substantive matters or the merits of the claim.

(1) The claimant petitioned for writ of review, contending that section 4062.3, subdivision (f) explicitly precludes any ex parte communication between a panel-qualified medical evaluator and a party and that the WCAB may not add an exception not contained in the statute. Petitioner also asserted that the failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.