Sandarg

Sandarg v. Dental Bd. of California

Good Law
109 Cal. Rptr. 3d 826·184 Cal. App. 4th 1434·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 747
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 26, 2010B210072California2,257 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hitching, J.

INTRODUCTION

The Dental Board of California (board) revoked Scott Sandarg’s dental license after adopting a decision by an administrative law judge. Sandarg filed a petition for a writ of mandate in the superior court seeking reinstatement of his license. The superior court denied Sandarg’s petition. We affirm.

We publish a portion of this opinion in order to address an issue of first impression: What is the standard of proof for a petition to revoke a dental licentiate’s probation? We shall conclude that the standard of proof is preponderance of the evidence.

BACKGROUND

1. The Initial Revocation of Sandarg’s License and the Placement of Sandarg on Probation

Sandarg obtained a license to practice dentistry in California in 1997. Shortly after obtaining his license, Sandarg commenced a course of conduct that led to disciplinary action.

In 1999, the board filed an accusation against Sandarg for self-furnishing of a controlled substance and alteration of patient charts. In March 2000, the board and Sandarg entered into a stipulation in settlement of the accusation, which became effective as of April 17, 2000.

Under the stipulation Sandarg admitted that in violation of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.