Cropsey

People v. Marie Cropsey

Good Law
109 Cal. Rptr. 3d 324·184 Cal. App. 4th 961·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 697
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 18, 2010C061053California1,438 words

Opinion

Opinion

Cantil-Sakauye, J.

Defendant Jennelle Marie Cropsey pled no contest to assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1); count one) and driving with 0.08 percent or more of alcohol in her blood (Veh. Code, § 23152, subd. (b); count three). She was placed on probation on conditions including payment of a $200 restitution fine (§ 1202.4, subd. (b)) and a $200 restitution fine suspended pending successful completion of probation (§ 1202.44). Following a first violation of probation, the court reinstated probation and dissolved the suspension of the $200 probation revocation fine. Following a third probation violation, the court sentenced defendant to state prison, suspended execution of sentence, and reinstated probation. The court “reimpose[d]” the $200 restitution fine and the $200 probation revocation restitution fine. It added a $200 restitution fine suspended unless parole is revoked. (§ 1202.45.)

On appeal, defendant contends the trial court erred by imposing “two separate restitution fines for the same conviction pursuant to . . . section 1202.4, subdivision (b),” and by imposing “two separate restitution fines for the same conviction pursuant to . . . section 1202.44.” We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.