Bomersheim

Bomersheim v. Los Angeles Gay & Lesbian Center

Good Law
109 Cal. Rptr. 3d 832·184 Cal. App. 4th 1471·2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 748
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 26, 2010B208730California5,476 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chaney, J.

In this negligence case the trial court denied plaintiffs’

motion to certify a class, finding no community of interest existed and the class action vehicle was not a superior method of resolving the claims of putative class members. Because we conclude the order is based on improper criteria and is not supported by substantial evidence, we reverse and direct the trial court to grant the motion.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

The following allegations, facts, and evidence are drawn from the fifth amended complaint, the motion seeking leave to file the fifth amended complaint, and the motion to certify a class.

Defendant Los Angeles Gay & Lesbian Center (defendant or the Center) provides medical services in Los Angeles County. From January 1999 to March 2004 defendant treated with Bicillin C-R more than 600 patients presenting with confirmed syphilis infection or reported sexual contact with someone who was known or suspected to be infected with syphilis. Bicillin C-R is not recommended for such use. The proper formulation would have been Bicillin L-A. Though both medications contain the same amount of penicillin, Bicillin C-R is a mixture of short- and long-acting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.