Mateljan

People v. Mateljan

Good Law
129 Cal. App. 4th 367·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 760·2005 Daily Journal DAR 5524·28 Cal. Rptr. 3d 506·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4049
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 12, 2005D044282California3,971 words

Opinion

Opinion

Benke, J.

Since February 11, 2004, Vehicle Code section 23158 has permitted certified phlebotomists to draw blood without direct supervision from a physician or registered nurse from persons suspected of driving under the influence of alcohol. However, each of the appellants in this case was suspected of driving under the influence and taken into custody before February 11, 2004. Each appellant elected to have a blood test rather than a breath test. In each case, although the practice had not yet been authorized by the Legislature, a phlebotomist acting without direct supervision from a physician, registered nurse, licensed clinical laboratory scientist or analyst drew the suspect’s blood. According to an expert offered by the People, the draws were accomplished in a manner which did not create any medical risk for the suspects.

By way of motions to suppress, each appellant argued that the absence of statutory authority to use phlebotomists should prevent the prosecution from relying on the blood which had been drawn from him or her. The trial court denied their motions, the appellate division affirmed the trial court’s ruling and granted appellants’ application for certification…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.