Castille

People v. Castille

Good Law
129 Cal. App. 4th 863·2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 847·2005 Daily Journal DAR 6052·29 Cal. Rptr. 3d 71·2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4412
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 24, 2005A089623California9,112 words

Opinion

Opinion

Corrigan, J.

Three defendants were tried together for murder with special circumstances and attendant enhancements. They had been questioned during a joint interview, a tape recording of which was admitted at trial. In our original opinion, we held that the statements were properly admitted against each defendant. (People v. Castille (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 469 [ 133 Cal.Rptr.2d 489 ]) (Castille I). The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Crawford v. Washington (2004) 541 U.S. 36 [ 158 L.Ed.2d 177 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 ] (Crawford). We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Remon Shields and Clemeth Ray Castille, both 17 years old, and Robert Brown, age 18, decided to rob Sharif’s Market in Oakland. Shields collected two sawed-off shotguns: a single-shot 16-gauge Winchester and a pump-action, 12-gauge Mossberg. After Shields put the guns in Brown’s car, Brown drove all three to the store.

At Shields’s direction, Brown made a U-turn in front of the market and parked about 15 feet from the door. Shields and Castille got out of the car, put on ski masks and covered their heads. Before entering the store, Shields…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.