People v. Jackson

Good Law
129 Cal. App. 4th 129·28 Cal. Rptr. 3d 136
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 7, 2005B125364California16,201 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

A jury convicted defendants Kaseen Jackson and Jant Price of one count of murder and two counts of attempted murder. It also convicted Jackson on a third count of attempted murder not involving Price. In the published portions of this opinion we hold the Leon “good faith” exception does not apply to a motion to suppress unlawfully obtained wiretap evidence; the wiretap evidence in this case was unlawfully obtained because the wiretap orders failed to identify any of the persons who were targets of the wiretaps; and the prosecution must disclose all statements of the defendant intercepted by a wiretap. We also find, however, these errors were not prejudicial under the facts of this case. In the unpublished portions of this opinion we discuss the appellants’ remaining contentions and conclude the judgments should be affirmed after minor modifications in the sentences.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

Bearing in mind the numerous evidentiary issues raised by defendants, we nevertheless state the facts in the manner most favorable to the judgment in accord with the usual rules on appeal.

A. Murder of Hendrix; Attempted Murders of Smith and Andrews.

1. A Day of Peace Turns into…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.