Coffey

Coffey v. Superior Court

Good Law
129 Cal. App. 4th 809·29 Cal. Rptr. 3d 59
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 16, 2005A108693California5,740 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stevens, J.

Tariq Coffey (Coffey) seeks a writ of mandate requiring the trial court to order the return of DNA samples taken under the purported authority of Penal Code section 295 et seq. (DNA and Forensic Identification Database and Data Bank Act of 1998) (hereafter, the DNA Database Act). Although he pled guilty to a “wobbler” as a felony and the DNA samples were collected, the charge was subsequently reduced pursuant to section 17, subdivision (b), and he was sentenced to a misdemeanor. Coffey contends the samples were obtained in violation of his rights under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, because the DNA Database Act did not authorize collection of samples from defendants convicted of misdemeanors.

We deny Coffey’s petition.

I. Facts and Procedural History

Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, in January 2003 Coffey pled guilty to assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)), as a felony. Although there was no written plea agreement, the terms of the plea were purportedly stated on the record. In furtherance of the agreement, sentencing was set over for one year with the understanding that if Coffey was not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.