In Re Marriage of Selzer

Caution
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 1076·29 Cal. App. 2d 637·29 Cal. App. 4th 637·34 Cal. Rptr. 2d 824·94 Daily Journal DAR 14972
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 24, 1994A063824California3,841 words

Opinion

Opinion

Peterson, J.

Appellant Richard P. Selzer contends the trial court erred in allowing his former wife Sheila to move from Ukiah to Santa Rosa where she obtained new employment, while taking the minor child of the former marriage with her. We find no abuse of discretion and affirm.

I. Facts and Procedural History

The relevant facts may be very briefly summarized for the purposes of background. Richard and Sheila Selzer began to live separately around the time their daughter Ashley was two or three; they subsequently divorced. Ashley has always resided with Sheila; the parents have joint legal custody; primary physical custody is with Sheila, while Richard has reasonable visitation rights. Richard and Sheila have been able to manage well with their daughter, who is loved by both parents. Originally, there were no major problems while all three continued to live near each other in Ukiah. They stipulated Richard would have Ashley on alternating weekends, alternating Tuesday and Thursday evenings, and additional periods agreeable to the parties. While the particulars of visitation have changed somewhat over the years and there have been some disagreements and inevitable tensions between…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.