Lackner

Lackner v. Department of Health Services

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 1137·29 Cal. App. 2d 1760·29 Cal. App. 4th 1760·35 Cal. Rptr. 2d 482·94 Daily Journal DAR 15917
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 10, 1994A063069California1,765 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dossee, J.

In this proceeding, plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of Welfare and Institutions Code section 14016.5, which provides that MediCal beneficiaries will be assigned to and enrolled in a managed care plan unless the Medi-Cal beneficiary timely elects to obtain services from a fee-for-service provider and certifies that he or she has an established relationship with a Medi-Cal provider. Plaintiffs contend that this “default” provision forces certain Medi-Cal recipients to be involuntarily enrolled in a managed care plan and denies them their right to choose their own health care provider.

Background

The Statute

The California Medi-Cal program funds health care services for recipients of public assistance and for other medically indigent persons. (§ 14000 et seq.) The program provides two health care options: (1) a fee-for-service plan and (2) a prepaid managed health care plan. (§ 14016.5, subd. (b).) The Legislature has declared its intent to encourage enrollment in managed care plans to improve the quality and efficiency of delivery of health care services and to cut costs. (§§ 14000, subds. (a) & (c), 14201 .)

Medi-Cal applicants are required to attend a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.