Gruntz

People v. Gruntz

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 1058·29 Cal. App. 2d 412·29 Cal. App. 4th 412·35 Cal. Rptr. 2d 55·94 Daily Journal DAR 14831
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 19, 1994B078914California5,043 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hastings, J.

Robert Gruntz appeals from the judgment entered following a jury trial in which he was convicted of the misdemeanor of failing to provide for his two minor children (Pen. Code, § 270). He was sentenced to 360 days in county jail. He appealed to the superior court, which affirmed the judgment in an opinion filed September 1, 1993, which was certified for partial publication. We ordered the matter transferred to this court pursuant to rule 62 of the California Rules of Court on October 19, 1993.

As set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the municipal court.

Factual And Procedural Background

Appellant and Susannah Gruntz were married in 1974. They had a boy, B. in 1974 and a girl, M. in 1976. Susannah and appellant separated and were divorced in 1978. Susannah received custody of the children and appellant was ordered to pay $300 month in child support. Appellant initially began making payments as ordered, but shortly thereafter, fell behind. By October 1988, he was in arrears $5,100.

Appellant was employed as a pari-mutuel clerk for the Los Alamitos race track, trained horses and had also completed law school. In October 1988, he filed a voluntary petition for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.