People v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.

Caution
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 1049·29 Cal. App. 2d 323·29 Cal. App. 4th 323·34 Cal. Rptr. 2d 503·94 Daily Journal DAR 14689
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 18, 1994B085370California4,115 words

Opinion

Opinion

Epstein, J.

A magistrate purported to reduce two felony charges to misdemeanors because she believed the evidence presented at the preliminary hearing was insufficient to hold the defendant to answer felony charges. Neither offense was a felony-misdemeanor (wobbler) as to which the reduced crime was a misdemeanor. We conclude the magistrate was without power to reduce the offenses to these misdemeanors, and that her doing so amounted to a dismissal of the felony charges. The district attorney brought a Penal Code section 871.5 motion, but the superior court declined to consider it, reasoning that the magistrate’s order did not result in a dismissal of charges, a requisite of the motion. We conclude that a dismissal did occur, and hence that the superior court should review the magistrate’s order pursuant to Penal Code section 871.5. We therefore shall issue a peremptory writ directing it to do so. We express no opinion on the merits of the dismissal the trial court is to review.

Factual and Procedural Summary

At the felony preliminary hearing, held in May 1994, Vicki D. testified substantially as follows. She is an attorney, and she went to the state building in Van Nuys to appear…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.