Shively

Shively v. Dye Creek Cattle Co.

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 1130·29 Cal. App. 2d 1620·29 Cal. App. 4th 1620·35 Cal. Rptr. 2d 238·94 Daily Journal DAR 15877
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 9, 1994C016355California5,273 words

Opinion

Opinion

Davis, J.

In this personal injury action, plaintiffs sued the defendant (Dye Creek) after their car struck one of Dye Creek’s black Angus bulls that was positioned on the roadway of State Highway 44 in Lassen County. The collision occurred at night and pitted the plaintiffs’ 1977 Toyota Corolla against a bull that weighed approximately 1,200 to 1,500 pounds. Finding that Dye Creek owed no duty to plaintiffs because plaintiffs had not set forth any basis to establish that duty, the trial court granted Dye Creek a summary judgment. We reverse.

Background

The facts of the collision are undisputed. As described by plaintiffs, they are: “On June 19, 1988 at approximately 10:00 p.m. [plaintiff] Harold Shively was operating a 1977 Toyota Corolla eastbound on Highway 44 in Lassen County. His wife, [plaintiff] Betty [Shively], was a passenger in that vehicle. [Plaintiffs] had just traveled through a heavily forested area consisting of hilly terrain. The [plaintiffs’] vehicle was on a slight decline in a left to right curve. They entered a meadow which constitutes part of an area of land known as Hog Flat. Approximately 450 feet from the east end of the turn Mr. Shively struck a full grown…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.