Hayes

People v. Hayes

Good Law
137 Cal. App. 4th 34·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 273·2006 Daily Journal DAR 2383·39 Cal. Rptr. 3d 747·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1644
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 2006A109299California5,229 words

Opinion

Opinion

Marchiano, J.

This is an appeal from an order, following a jury verdict, recommitting defendant Dexter Hayes as a sexually violent predator (SVP). It arises out of the procedural entanglement of conducting a probable cause hearing simultaneously with trial.

In the fall of 2000, a jury found defendant to be an SVP within the meaning of Welfare and Institutions Code section 6600. As a result, the trial court civilly committed him to a treatment facility of the Department of Mental Health for two years. (§§ 6600, 6604.) We affirmed the SVP commitment in a prior proceeding. (People v. Hayes (Mar. 26, 2002, A093285) [nonpub. opn.].)

As we shall explain further, post, the People petitioned to recommit defendant as an SVP. This required a pretrial probable cause hearing on the recommitment petition. Instead of conducting a probable cause hearing within a reasonable time of the filing of the petition to recommit, the trial court conducted the hearing at the conclusion of, instead of before and as a prerequisite to, the trial on that petition. The deviation from statutory requirements amounts to procedural error which affected defendant’s due process. But on the facts of this case, we must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.