Healy

Healy v. Tuscany Hills Landscape & Recreation Corp.

Good Law
137 Cal. App. 4th 1·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 269·2006 Daily Journal DAR 2397·39 Cal. Rptr. 3d 547·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1697
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 2006E036896California1,371 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

Plaintiff and cross-defendant Tuscany Hills Landscape & Recreation Corporation appeals from an order denying its special motion to strike a cause of action for defamation asserted by defendant and cross-complainant Gloria Healy. The trial court denied the motion based on its conclusion that Healy had demonstrated a reasonable probability that she would prevail on the defamation cause of action. We conclude that the allegedly defamatory publication comes within the scope of the litigation privilege and that there is therefore no possibility that Healy could prevail on her cause of action.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Tuscany Hills Landscape & Recreation Corporation (hereafter Tuscany Hills or the association) is the homeowners association for a Lake Elsinore development known as Tuscany Hills. Gloria Healy is the owner of a property within the development, 6 Villa Scencero. Tuscany Hills filed a complaint, and ultimately a first amended complaint, alleging that Healy wrongfully denied the association access through her property to an adjacent slope over which the association has maintenance obligations, specifically weed abatement to reduce fire hazard. The first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.