Pietrobon

Pietrobon v. Libarle

Good Law
137 Cal. App. 4th 992·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 387·2006 Daily Journal DAR 3326·40 Cal. Rptr. 3d 718·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2369
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 21, 2006A109972California2,616 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lambden, J.

Introduction

Defendant Marc Libarle appeals from a judgment of the Sonoma County Superior Court in favor of plaintiff Renzo Pietrobon on plaintiff’s action against defendant for breach of a settlement agreement. Defendant contends there was no written settlement agreement and that the court erred in ruling that the four-year statute of limitations for an action upon a contract founded upon an instrument in writing (Code Civ. Proc., § 337 ) applied. He further argues that if there was a written agreement, it did not satisfy the statute of frauds (Civ. Code, § 1624, subd. (a)) because he had never signed it.

Facts and Procedural Background

The relevant facts are undisputed. On May 11, 2000, defendant, an attorney, and plaintiff, a former client, entered into a settlement of plaintiff’s lawsuit against defendant in open court before the Honorable Raymond J. Giordano. The parties agreed to a stipulated judgment in the total amount of $55,000, and that defendant would pay plaintiff certain sums on a payment schedule over a two-year period. The parties agreed that if defendant made payments in accordance with the schedule set forth on the record, the debt would be discharged…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.