DeLAURA

DeLAURA v. Beckett

Good Law
137 Cal. App. 4th 542·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 321·2006 Daily Journal DAR 2932·40 Cal. Rptr. 3d 253·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2116
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 2006A109948California2,130 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pollak, J.

Mary E. Creighton DeLaura appeals from a judgment dismissing her first amended complaint for declaratory relief against her tenant, James Beckett. The court entered the judgment of dismissal after it sustained without leave to amend Beckett’s demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it failed to allege a justiciable controversy. We conclude that the demurrer was properly sustained because the applicability of certain provisions of the San Francisco Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance (rent ordinance) to Beckett’s tenancy is more appropriately resolved through an administrative hearing before the San Francisco Rent Board. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

DeLaura, in her capacity as trustee for the Mary E. Creighton DeLaura trust, owns residential property at 20 Vulcan Street in San Francisco. There are two free-standing buildings on the property. Beckett rents one of the buildings, a single family dwelling, pursuant to a written lease agreement.

In February 2004, when Beckett learned that DeLaura was planning to subdivide the property to create two separate parcels, he wrote to the San Francisco Department of Public…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.