Boyle

Boyle v. CertainTeed Corp.

Good Law
137 Cal. App. 4th 645·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 329·2006 Daily Journal DAR 2971·40 Cal. Rptr. 3d 501·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2113
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 10, 2006A108301California3,857 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sepulveda, J.

The San Francisco County Superior Court has a general order applicable to asbestos injury cases that provides for expedited summary judgment on 60 days notice and without supporting papers except for an attorney certification that plaintiff’s discovery responses fail to identify evidence showing exposure to asbestos for which the defendant is responsible. We conclude that the trial court’s general order conflicts with the statewide statute governing summary judgment motions, which requires 75 days notice and supporting evidence, and is thus invalid. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c.) We reverse the summary judgment granted under the expedited procedure.

I.

FACTS

Plaintiffs are family members of Charles Edward Boyle who died in March 2002, allegedly from mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure. Plaintiffs filed a wrongful death action against CertainTeed Corporation (CertainTeed) and many other defendants. Plaintiffs allege that CertainTeed manufactured or distributed asbestos.

On June 11, 2004, CertainTeed served and filed notice of its intent to request expedited summary judgment pursuant to San Francisco County Superior Court General Order No. 157 (General Order No. 157).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.