Csaa

California State Automobile Association Inter-Insurance Bureau v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

Good Law
137 Cal. App. 4th 1040·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 391·2006 Daily Journal DAR 3460·40 Cal. Rptr. 3d 743·71 Cal. Comp. Cases 347
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 22, 2006A111888California3,020 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sepulveda, J.

The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Appeals Board) determined Paul Hestehauge was an employee of homeowners Wayne and Laurie Charkins for purposes of awarding workers’ compensation benefits. The Charkinses’ insurer, California State Automobile Association Inter-Insurance Bureau (CSAA), filed a petition for writ of review in this court challenging the Appeals Board’s determination. Neither Hestehauge nor the Appeals Board answered the petition. We granted the petition and issued a writ of review. We conclude Hestehauge was not an employee of the Charkinses.

BACKGROUND

The Charkinses hired Hestehauge to paint the living room, dining room, and possibly the kitchen of their home. Their agreement was informal—nothing was put into writing. Hestehauge was visiting from his native Australia, and the Charkinses had met him through a mutual friend. Hestehauge was an experienced house painter, but he did not have a California contractor’s license.

On Hestehauge’s first day painting at the Charkinses’ home, he fell from a ladder placed on top of a scaffold. He suffered serious injuries.

Hestehauge applied for workers’ compensation benefits. He also filed a civil suit against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.