McDonald

People v. McDonald

Good Law
137 Cal. App. 4th 521·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 315·2006 Daily Journal DAR 2840·40 Cal. Rptr. 3d 422·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2013
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 8, 2006A108690California7,633 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kline, J.

This case presents the question whether it is a crime under California state law to urinate in public.

David McDonald challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence under Penal Code section 1538.5. The evidence was seized after McDonald was detained for urinating in a public place. McDonald claims the detention and search incident thereto were unlawful because the Penal Code does not criminalize his act. As the officer who detained McDonald could lawfully do so only on the basis of a reasonable articulable suspicion McDonald was engaged in, or about to engage in, criminal activity, we are compelled to decide what appears to be a question of first impression—whether the California Legislature has criminalized public urination. We answer the question in the affirmative and shall therefore uphold the denial of McDonald’s motion to suppress.

Factual and Procedural Background

Oakland Police Officer Francisco Rojas observed McDonald urinating in the parking lot of a restaurant in the 3000 block of San Pablo Avenue in Berkeley on Sunday, January 26, 2003, at 11:23 a.m. At the time, the restaurant was closed, and the parking lot was empty, save for a vehicle that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.