People v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

Good Law
141 Cal. App. 4th 1228·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1189·2006 Daily Journal DAR 10092·47 Cal. Rptr. 3d 92·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7119
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 2, 2006C048336California10,442 words

Opinion

Opinion

Scotland, J.

The People of the State of California filed a civil complaint against the Union Pacific Railroad Company (Union Pacific) and the Chemical Lime Company of Arizona (Chemical Lime) based upon the spillage of substantial quantities of calcium oxide into the environment.

Demurrers were sustained without leave to amend and the complaint was dismissed because the trial court concluded the People’s claims are pre empted in their entirety by the federal Hazardous Materials Transportation Authorization Act of 1994 (HMTA) ( 49 U.S.C. § 5101 et seq.) and the Federal Railroad Safety Authorization Act of 1994 (FRSA) (49 U.S.C. 20101 et seq.). The People appeal from the judgment of dismissal.

We shall reverse the judgment and remand the matter for further proceedings. As we will explain, the state requirement of immediate verbal notification of the spill of calcium oxide and the imposition of a civil penalty for its violation are not preempted by federal law. Also not preempted by federal law is liability for remedial measures, such as abatement, cleanup, assessment and remediation of environmental injury, and consequential damages. However, the imposition of civil penalties for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.