Kleveland

Kleveland v. Chicago Title Insurance

Good Law
141 Cal. App. 4th 761·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1134·2006 Daily Journal DAR 9665·46 Cal. Rptr. 3d 314·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6672
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 24, 2006B187427California1,326 words

Opinion

Opinion

Coffee, J.

Is an arbitration clause in a title insurance policy enforceable where arbitration was not mentioned in the preliminary title report and where that report referred to a policy that was different than that actually issued by the insurer? We conclude the answer is no. Under these circumstances, the arbitration clause was not incorporated by reference into the preliminary report and is not binding upon the insured. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiffs Chris Kleveland and AOK Land Company LLC purchased a title insurance policy from defendant Chicago Title Insurance Company (Chicago Title) on the basis of a preliminary title report they received and approved. The preliminary report described the real property to be insured, the coverage to be afforded and the exceptions and exclusions to that coverage, but it did not indicate the policy would include an arbitration clause. The cover sheet of the preliminary report stated, “The form of policy title insurance contemplated by this report is: ALTA [American Land Title Association] HOMEOWNER’S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (11/98).” It further advised, “Copies of the Policy forms are available upon request.” This policy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.