In Re Arcenio

Good Law
141 Cal. App. 4th 613·46 Cal. Rptr. 3d 232
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 20, 2006B186990California1,464 words

Opinion

Opinion

The minor, Arcenio V., appeals the October 26, 2005 wardship order (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602) and placement in a camp community placement program. The juvenile court sustained the allegations of a petition filed October 4, 2005, charging the minor with single counts of firearm possession (Pen.Code, [1] § 12101, subd. (a)(1)) and live ammunition possession by a minor. (§ 12101, subd. (b)(1).) The minor argues there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for possession of live ammunition. We agree. We reverse the jurisdictional order in part.

We view the evidence in a light most favorable to the judgment. ( Jackson v. Virginia (1979) 443 U.S. 307, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 ; People v. Elliot (2005) 37 Cal.4th 453, 466 , 35 Cal. Rptr.3d 759 , 122 P.3d 968 ; People v. Osband (1996) 13 Cal.4th 622, 690 , 55 Cal. Rptr.2d 26 , 919 P.2d 640 ; Taylor v. Stainer (9th Cir.1994) 31 F.3d 907, 908-909 ; see also In re Cheri T. (1999) 70 Cal.App.4th 1400, 1404 , 83 Cal.Rptr.2d 397 ; In re Babak S. (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 1077, 1088-1089 , 22 Cal.Rptr.2d 893 [standard of proof is the same in juvenile proceedings as that required in adult criminal trials]; In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.